Home > classical music > Pachelbel Canon in D Major Perfect Version

Pachelbel Canon in D Major Perfect Version

January 22nd, 2010 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Classical music by johanne pachelbel

Duration : 0:6:20


Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

  1. iumumu
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #1

    thats a mistake.. …
    thats a mistake..its mozart pic..not Pachelbel’s…

  2. DudrickStudios
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #2

    @1y im guessing you …
    @1y im guessing you ment 1912

  3. 1y
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #3

    Ha! ha! Indeed ! My …
    Ha! ha! Indeed ! My grandmother told me that when she was born, in 1612, cameras were hardly reaching 0.25 mega pixels :)

  4. eebcorp
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #4

    master piece

    im 14 …
    master piece

    im 14 and i like this music :D

  5. GertieSchwarzannager
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #5

    luv it
    luv it

  6. panchelbel007
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #6

    @63Pyro It’s a …
    @63Pyro It’s a really moving piece, isn’t it?

  7. panchelbel007
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #7

    @julianoalberto I’m …
    @julianoalberto I’m sorry… I have no idea what you’re talking about. This is a portrait painting. Pachelbel lived in the 1600s and Mozart in the 1700s. Cameras? Could you explain?

  8. MissBeachLover
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #8

    beautiful melody… …
    beautiful melody… I love it….:)

  9. panchelbel007
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #9

    @GTASACJ666 It’s a …
    @GTASACJ666 It’s a picture of Mozart. Pachelbel was decidedly less handsome.

  10. stevesmithize
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #10

    Check out my …
    Check out my ringtone of this video 0:10 – 0:43 at tube2tone

  11. julianoalberto
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #11

    @GTASACJ666 At that …
    @GTASACJ666 At that time the digital cameras had a poor resolution. Something around 0.2 mega pixels. That is why they are very similar.

  12. BartvG88
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #12

    @graymouse13 but in …
    @graymouse13 but in a good way, right?

  13. GTASACJ666
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #13

    wtf? is there any …
    wtf? is there any difference between mozart and this guy?:D pics same

  14. zuvelinisto
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #14

    Just produced a …
    Just produced a ring-tone from 0:10 – 0:43 on tube2tone

  15. COWofHACKNEY
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #15

    3 violins and a …
    3 violins and a basso continuo… not sure of the continuo makeup however.

  16. wholedunt
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #16

    trimmed this video …
    trimmed this video and made a ringtone 0:10 – 0:43 on tube2tone

  17. sitenghuang
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #17

    i really love ths
    i really love ths

  18. Kan2209
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #18

    They use this for …
    They use this for weddings, maybe that’s why.

  19. bako302
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #19

    this is my FAVORITE …
    this is my FAVORITE classic!..u know this classic is made by playing about 4 voices the same sheets in different time one after another. i played this once with 2 voices in a group of violins.

  20. vanhalenmk
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #20

    Very Very well said …
    Very Very well said !

  21. graymouse13
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #21

    makes me feel like …
    makes me feel like im on my deathbed

  22. sweetiepsyche
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #22

    a true masterpiece!
    a true masterpiece!

  23. josie6989
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #23

    WONDERFUL!! …
    WONDERFUL!! !。!

  24. joebloecat
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #24

    What is this …
    What is this version??? Soooooo beautiful!!!

  25. psychostupe
    January 22nd, 2010 at 17:15 | #25

    the instuments that …
    the instuments that you would find in a quartet i think but meh idk

  1. No trackbacks yet.